Skip to Content

Malnutrition Care Score (MCS)

In the United States, quality measures help patients choose high-performing clinicians and enable healthcare providers to assess and improve care. The Malnutrition Care Score (MCS) - formerly the Global Malnutrition Composite Score (GMCS)—is the first nutrition-focused electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) included in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program under the FY 2023 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule. Developed and stewarded by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Commission on Dietetic Registration (CDR), the MCS was endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) Consensus Standards Approval Committee (CSAC) for 2021-2024. In Spring 2024, the Partnership for Quality Measurement (PQM) Endorsement and Maintenance (E&M) Committee also endorsed updated specifications that include the expansion to adults aged 18 and older.

What are Quality Measures?

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) collect and analyze data to produce reports utilizing quality improvement and quality measurement data to improve outcomes while reducing burden on clinicians and providers. 

Infographic: "Acute Care Quality Measurement for Malnutrition" with concentric circles (CMS, IPPS, IQR, eCQM, MCS), legend, CDR logo, Copyright 2025 and contact quality@eatright.org for info.

 

Within the CMS programs lies the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, a pay-for-reporting initiative that requires hospitals to submit quality and safety data to reduce complications, lower mortality rates, and deliver high-quality care. These results are publicly shared on the Care Compare website.

Electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs), part of the IQR Program, leverage data extracted from electronic health records (EHR) or health information technology (HIT) systems to assess care quality. Hospitals submit eCQM data directly from these systems.

For Reporting Period 2024-2025, Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals must report on 6 electronic clinical quality measures for each reporting period-three mandatory and three self-selected. The MCS was approved as a self-selected eCQM and is 1 of 11 eCQMs available for reporting period 2026 and beyond.  

When implementing the MCS, understanding key reporting terms is crucial. The Reporting Period is the calendar year that the data will be collected. The data collected will then be submitted the following year, during the Submission Period. Ultimately, the data reported and submitted will directly be linked to the Payment Period Fiscal year that corresponds to the year after the Submission Period.

Timeline for electronic clinical quality measures, including the MCS, from 2023 to 2027. It is showing reporting, submission, and payment periods for hospitals. Data flows from Reporting Period (CY) to Submission Period (CY) to Payment Period (FY). Key explains CY (Calendar Year) and FY (Fiscal Year). CDR logo at the bottom with 2025 Copyright and contact email for additional information.

 

 

Back to top ^

What is the Malnutrition Care Score?

The MCS assesses the percentage of hospitalizations for adults 65 years and older (if reporting data from 2024 and 2025) or all adults 18 year of age (for reporting data in 2026 or later), with a length of stay of at least 24 hours that have received optimal malnutrition care during the current inpatient hospitalizations.

The MCS follows evidence-based guidance to support malnutrition care, as shown below.

Infographic titled 'Evidence-Based Clinical Workflow for Malnutrition Care,' showing steps from hospital admission to resolving malnutrition: Screening (Measure Observation#1), Assessment (Measure Observation #2), Diagnosis (Measure Observation#3), Care Plan (Measure Observation#4), and Discharge Planning. Ends with resolved diagnosis or ongoing care. CDR logo at the bottom with 2025 Copyright and contact email for additional information.

 

For measure specifications and implementation tools go here.

Back to top ^

The Value of Implementing a Malnutrition Quality Measure

Malnutrition is defined as the inadequate intake of nutrients or energy, over time, and can have many root causes. A hospitalized patient with malnutrition can place a strain on resources, and negatively affect quality outcomes, as shown in the figure below.

Infographic titled 'Impact of Malnutrition in Health Care,' highlighting four key consequences: 1) Higher likelihood of 30-day readmissions (56% increase, with septicemia as a leading diagnosis); 2) Longer length of stay (9.0 vs. 4.7 days); 3) High risk of complications (e.g., infections, anemia, and gastrointestinal issues); and 4) Higher costs ($23,579 vs. $13,610 per stay) and in-hospital mortality (5x higher). Sources cited include Barrett ML, Avalere Health, and Tappenden et al. CDR logo at the bottom with 2024 Copyright and contact email for additional information.

 

Clinical guidelines for addressing malnutrition in acute care settings establish that a patient should first be screened for risk for malnutrition, those at risk should be further assessed, and if found to have malnutrition by assessment, then a nutrition support plan should be established (3).

Effective malnutrition care processes benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration. This type of care offers an opportunity to develop a comprehensive and individualized assessment and treatment plan, and thus supporting accurate diagnosis and effective care. The following graphic shows the key roles different profession in a hospital can offer to help achieve successful implementation of the MCS.

Graphic illustrating the key stakeholders for successful implementation of the Malnutrition Care Score (MCS). The design emphasizes collaboration across roles including administration, nursing staff, physicians and eligible clinicians, pharmacists, credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners, and information technology and electronic health records. At the bottom, it says 2025 Copyright with the CDR logo and email address quality@eatright.org for additional information.

 

The MCS follows the recommended workflow of evidence-based malnutrition care and encourages interdisciplinary care discussions and involvement during implementation and clinical care. Although the MCS was developed for the acute care setting, its proven framework can be adapted to any practice area to improve patient outcomes and quality of care.

Benefits of implementing the MCS:

  • Providing care measured through the MCS supports hospitals’ strategic plans to address social determinants of health and equity.
  • All four components are often already established in acute care facilities.
  • Addresses several clinical areas or quality indicators simultaneously, including:
    • Nutrition Screening - The Joint Commission
    • Social Determinants of Health and Food Insecurity - The Joint Commission, CMS, 2023 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set’s (HEDIS) Social Need Screening and Intervention Measure
    • Health Equity Advancement - identified by CMS as a priority eCQM
    • Rural Health Improvement- identified by NQF as a key measure**
  • Combines several quality measures into one single composite score, giving a more comprehensive picture of clinical care than a single measure.
  • Promotes multidisciplinary engagement, supporting communication and employee satisfaction efforts.

Back to top ^

Free Education Resources

Back to top ^

MCS Implementation Resources
Annual Update CycleApplication Year*Consensus Based EndorsementSpecification and Value SetsSpecification ManualAdditional Resources
2023

Reporting Period CY 2024 

Submission Period CY 2025 

Payment Period FY 2026

NQF #3592e through Fall 2024Global Malnutrition Composite Score | eCQI Resource Center (healthit.gov)GMCS Specification Manual

GMCS FAQs 

AU2023 Possible Combinations Table 

GMCS Process Map

2024

Reporting Period CY 2025

Submission Period CY 2026 

Payment Period FY 2027

PQM #3592e, Spring 2024, through Spring 2029Global Malnutrition Composite Score | eCQI Resource Center (healthit.gov)AU2024 GMCS Specifications Manual

AU2024 GMCS FAQs 

AU2024 Possible Combinations Table 

AU2024 Process Map 

GMCS Score Calculator 

AU24 Data Collection in Preparation for Implementation GMCS

2025

Reporting Period CY 2026 

Submission Period CY 2027 

Payment Period FY 2028

PQM #3592e, Spring 2024, through Spring 2029Malnutrition Care Score | eCQI Resource CenterIn ProgressIn Progress

*Reporting Period is the period where data is collected. Submission Period is when data collected the prior year is submitted, usually during the Spring Quarter. Payment Period is the fiscal year the payment could potentially be affected if criteria for reporting is met or not met.

 

Additional implementation resources:

For additional information, questions, or support with implementation needs, please email quality@eatright.org.

Back to top ^

References and Additional Peer-Reviewed Documents
  1. Avalere Health. (2022). Leveraging Inpatient Malnutrition Care to Address Health Disparities. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://avalere.com/insights/leveraging-inpatient-malnutrition-care-to-address-health-disparities.
  2. Barrett ML, B. M. (2018). Non-maternal and Non-neonatal Inpatient Stays in the United States Involving Malnutrition, 2016. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/ataglance/HCUPMalnutritionHospReport_083018.pdf.
  3. Mueller C, Compher C & Druyan ME and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. Nutrition Screening, Assessment, and Intervention in Adults. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2011; 35 (1): 16-24. A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines (wiley.com)
  4. Arensberg MB, Saal-Ridpath K, Kerr K, Phillips W. Opportunities to Improve Quality Outcomes: Integrating Nutrition Care Into Medicare Advantage to Address Malnutrition and Support Social Determinants of Health. Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec; 59: 469580221081431. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081431. PMID: 35255728; PMCID: PMC8908402.
  5. Bechtold ML, Nepple KG, McCauley SM, Badaracco C, Malone A. Interprofessional implementation of the Global Malnutrition Composite Score quality measure. Nutr Clin Pract. 2023 Oct;38(5):987-997. doi: 10.1002/ncp.11033. Epub 2023 Jul 11. PMID: 37431796.
  6. Doley J, Phillips W. Accurate Coding Impacts the Geometric Length of Stay for Malnourished Inpatients. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Feb;119(2):193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.023. Epub 2018 Feb 21. PMID: 29429855.
  7. Guenter P, Abdelhadi R, Anthony P, Blackmer A, Malone A, Mirtallo JM, Phillips W, Resnick HE. Malnutrition diagnoses and associated outcomes in hospitalized patients: United States, 2018. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;36(5):957-969. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10771. Epub 2021 Sep 6. PMID: 34486169.
  8. Marshall S. Why Is the Skeleton Still in the Hospital Closet? A Look at the Complex Aetiology of Protein-Energy Malnutrition and Its Implications for the Nutrition Care Team. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(1):26-29. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0900-9. PMID: 29300418.
  9. Quartarolo J, Dolopo A, Richard B. Multidisciplinary effort to improve the diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;36(5):1068-1071. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10644. Epub 2021 Apr 5. PMID: 33821499.
  10. Schuetz P, Fehr R, Baechli V, Geiser M, Deiss M, Gomes F, Kutz A, Tribolet P, Bregenzer T, Braun N, Hoess C, Pavlicek V, Schmid S, Bilz S, Sigrist S, Brändle M, Benz C, Henzen C, Mattmann S, Thomann R, Brand C, Rutishauser J, Aujesky D, Rodondi N, Donzé J, Stanga Z, Mueller B. Individualised nutritional support in medical inpatients at nutritional risk: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2312-2321. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32776-4. Epub 2019 Apr 25. PMID: 31030981.
  11. Shepherd E. Malnutrition coding and reimbursement in the hospital setting. Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;37(1):35-40. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10779. Epub 2021 Sep 29. PMID: 34587310.
  12. Skipper, A.; Coltman, A.; Tomesko, J.; Charney, P.; Porcari, J.; Piemonte, T.A.; Handu, D.; Cheng, F.W. Reprint of: Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Malnutrition (Undernutrition) Screening Tools for All Adults. J Acad Nut Diet. 2022; 122: S50-S54. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.07.013.
  13. Sriram K, Sulo S, VanDerBosch G, et al. Nutrition-Focused Quality Improvement Program Results in Significant Readmission and Length of Stay Reductions for Malnourished Surgical Patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018;42(6):1093-1098. doi:10.1002/jpen.1040 
  14. White J V., Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Schofield M. Consensus Statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2012;36(3):275-283. doi:10.1177/0148607112440285
  15. Wills‐Gallagher J, Kerr KW, Macintosh B, Valladares AF, Kilgore KM, Sulo S. Implementation of malnutrition quality improvement reveals opportunities for better nutrition care delivery for hospitalized patients. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2022;46(1):243-248. doi:10.1002/jpen.2086 27.
  16. Sriram K, Sulo S, VanDerBosch G, et al. A comprehensive nutrition-focused quality improvement program reduces 30-day readmissions and length of stay in hospitalized patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(3):384-391.
  17. Sulo S, Feldstein J, Partridge J, et al. Budget impact of a comprehensive nutrition-focused quality improvement program for malnourished hospitalized patients. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017;10(5):262- 270.
  18. Tappenden, KA; Quatrara, B; Parkhurts, M; Malone, A; Fanjiang, G; Ziegler, T. (2013). Critical Role of Nutrition in Improving Quality Care: An Interdisciplinary Call to Action to Address Adult Hospital Malnutrition. J Acad Nutr and Diet. 113 (9); 1219-1237.
  19. Valladares AF, Kilgore KM, Partridge J, Sulo S, Kerr KW, McCauley S. How a Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative Furthers Malnutrition Measurement and Care: Results From a Hospital Learning Collaborative. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Feb;45(2):366-371.

 

Back to top ^

Back to top ^